ILO/Essex Observatory
for Work in the Digital Economy
A global political economy perspective
A global political economy perspective
Regulating artificial intelligence (AI) has become the battleground of industrial lobbyists, consumer groups, ethicists and policy makers, resulting in a proliferation of standards, guidelines and regulatory initiatives. A key contradiction for policy makers arises from the quest for national competitiveness in technological development as opposed to the legitimate needs of privacy for consumers and workers. Depending on their respective political economy, countries so far have opted for a mix of technological leniency, hard ex-ante regulation and soft-law approaches. However, given the growing share of digital services that are traded internationally, national regulatory bodies are subject not only to their own domestic pressure groups but also need to integrate the regulatory realities of their main trading partners. As a consequence, regulatory complexity has increased significantly, creating significant barriers to entry for newcomers, changing global AI value chains and adding regulatory opacity for consumers and workers, thereby undermining regulatory protection.
Regulation of technological developments is nothing new. Protecting consumers through product safety regulation, ensuring the functioning of critical infrastructure or safeguarding workers against occupational hazards has a long history in policy activities. Yet, with the arrival and widespread use of AI-powered tools, an additional layer of complexity is being introduced in modern societies, creating new forms of risks and needs to regulation. increased complexity calls not only for more regulation but most importantly for a different approach to regulation, taking into account the specific fault lines that are being introduced by increased complexity, including cascading failures, risk chunking and polarization.
Regulation
Development
Governance
A transition from a general laissez-faire disposition in prior decades to a growing interest in asserting the Party’s oversight over this ever more powerful industry.
Having has been a leading site of technological development, the USA stands out as surprisingly behind its competitors in the race to set global standards for AI development and regulation.
Over the last five years, the EUs’ institutions have prepared a proposal for an AI Act. It is the first attempt toward a hard law global regulation for AI integration.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis diss parturient.
As there is a long history of AI research in Canada, the country has a well-developed AI strategy, having been the first country in the world to develop a national AI strategy.
India is the second most populous country in the world, with a population of 1.4 billion people. There are currently no regulations that cover the use of AI at work in India.